Cricket Australia responds to New Zealand Cricket’s T20 as BBL expansion plans move forward

Todd Greenberg and Nick Cummins outline growth strategy and market challenges after NZ opts for domestic T20 focus

Cricket Australia, New Zealand Cricket NZC and Big Bash League BBL logos representing major cricket boards and T20 league branding

Cricket Australia’s expansion ambitions for the Big Bash League remain firmly on track despite New Zealand opting out of joining the competition, with senior executives signalling both acceptance of the decision and confidence in future growth.

Speaking to reporters at Junction Oval in Melbourne during the announcement of Australia’s home schedule, Cricket Australia Chief Executive Todd Greenberg addressed the development directly, stating, “I certainly wasn’t surprised,” while acknowledging the outcome of discussions with New Zealand Cricket.

Australia maintains expansion focus despite NZ decision

Greenberg indicated that Cricket Australia had engaged in multiple conversations with its New Zealand counterparts before the decision was made. “We’ve had a couple of conversations. We wanted to make sure they knew that they were welcome to join, and there was an opportunity for them to do so. But clearly they decided to go in another direction. That’s completely on them. History will be the judge.”

While New Zealand had been viewed as a natural extension market for the BBL, the Australian board is continuing to prioritise broader expansion pathways. “I think expansion is really important because it shows ambition, it shows a level of ambition about growth, and I don’t think we’ll be short of opportunities for expansion,” he said.

He added that the decision did not disrupt Cricket Australia’s internal strategy, noting, “We haven’t really thought too much about what’s happening in New Zealand. We’re really focused on ourselves.”

Competitive global landscape shaping BBL decisions

Cricket Victoria Chief Executive Nick Cummins, who was also present at the briefing, highlighted the increasing complexity of the global T20 ecosystem.

“I think Cricket Australia have put together a really compelling offer which we’ll consider over the next couple of weeks as the board and management,” Cummins said, referring to broader structural proposals linked to the league’s future.

He emphasised that decision-making would be driven by long-term priorities, adding, “The driving principle for us is we’ve got to do what’s best for Victorian cricket and that will sit at the front of our mind in any decision we make. There’s no doubt, coming just then with the announcement of New Zealand, that the landscape is much more competitive than when I started at Sydney Thunder at BBL 3 when we had the window to ourselves.”

Reflecting on how player dynamics have shifted, Cummins noted, “There was no pressure. Someone like Kevin Pietersen would gladly come and play in the Big Bash,” before adding, “(But) if Kevin Pietersen was playing now, he would have a range of decisions. One of them would be not to play at all, because he could earn enough money elsewhere, so we really need to be cognisant of that.”

He further underlined the importance of sustaining the league’s financial strength, stating, “I think we’ve got a lot to be proud about with the BBL. I think us and the IPL are the only T20 comps that actually make money, and we want to make sure that we stay at the front of the pack, so when we make this decision, we’ve got to make sure that we’re thinking about the next 50 years, not just the next five.”

At the same time, he warned of external pressures, saying, “But we’ve also got to be aware of the environment that we’re working in, and we at the moment, I think we run the risk of being priced out of our own market.”

New Zealand prioritises domestic league strategy

New Zealand Cricket’s decision to step away from the BBL opportunity followed internal deliberations at board level.

“There was extensive discussion on the merits of these (BBL) proposals,” New Zealand Cricket Chair Diana Puketapu-Lyndon said in an official statement. She added, “But the board concluded that now is the right time to revitalise our 21-year-old Super Smash competition.”

The move signals a strategic focus on strengthening its domestic T20 structure rather than integrating into an overseas league.

BBL confidence remains strong amid broader strategic decisions

Despite the setback in securing New Zealand as an expansion partner, Cricket Australia remains confident in the league’s commercial strength and long-term direction.

Greenberg pointed to the BBL’s track record, stating, “I mean, 15 years of the Big Bash have shown enormous growth. I think we’ve got an amazing product. It’s highly profitable. And the decision that rests on Australian cricket is what we do next. So it’s a (big) decision, but I’m less worried about what everyone else is doing. I’m really worried about what we’re doing.”

He also reflected on why New Zealand had been considered a logical addition, noting, “It felt like New Zealand were a pretty natural fit, given our two countries and the scale and size that we can have. But as I said, it’s a matter, and it’s a decision for them. It didn’t catch us by surprise. It was probably the one that was coming.”

Broader calendar and infrastructure ambitions remain central

Alongside league strategy, Greenberg outlined an expansive international schedule ahead, saying “It will be quite phenomenal. The tagline will be a season like no other (and) it’ll include some unique features,” as Australia prepares for a packed calendar across formats.

He also highlighted infrastructure developments, stating, “I want to congratulate Cricket Victoria specifically for the installation of these lights that have been a long time coming. They’ll be a great addition for another venue for women’s international and domestic cricket particularly. We will be able to use this venue under lights, which is awesome.”

Emphasising cricket’s national footprint, he added, “This is the reason why cricket is a national sport and it’s our national game here. We play matches for nine months international cricket across every state and territory in the country. We’re really pleased about this. It’s going to have some different looks to it, some different feels to it.”

Looking ahead, Greenberg pointed to marquee events, saying, “As I said, we’ll be back here in March this time next year, finishing with what I think will be the highlight of the summer, which will be the 150th Test match, where the entire cricketing world will be here in Melbourne.”

Player workload and scheduling pressures in focus

With an increasingly dense calendar, player management is emerging as a key operational priority.

“It’s going to be a challenging summer for a variety of different components, including the management of players and high performance,” Greenberg said, noting the demands placed on athletes.

He added, “And I think you’re seeing that already play out this summer, the way we’re managing players at the moment, the way players are starting to get themselves up for what’s going to be … an amazing 12-month period for Test cricket, particularly.”

Highlighting the complexity of scheduling, he concluded, “But there’ll be some challenges. There’s some short turnarounds inside the New Zealand Test series. We then go to India. So I think it will highlight the importance of high-quality planning, management of players, players understanding what they prioritise and that won’t please everybody, but that’s part of the challenge of modern day cricket.”

Taken together, Cricket Australia’s response signals a clear strategic direction — one that prioritises internal growth, long-term commercial sustainability and adaptability in an increasingly competitive global T20 landscape. While New Zealand’s decision removes one immediate expansion pathway, it has not altered the broader ambition to evolve the BBL as a leading international franchise property.

,