Batting order is overrated in T20 cricket, says Gautam Gambhir as he outlines flexible approach

The India head coach emphasized impact-based decision‑making and fluid roles after the 2‑1 T20I series win in Australia.

Gautam Gambhir standing next to the BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India) logo on a blue background, representing his association with Indian cricket.

Photo Credit: Instagram Photo of @gautamgambhir55

Gambhir reiterates evolving T20 philosophy

Following India’s 2‑1 T20I series win in Australia, head coach Gautam Gambhir has reiterated that flexibility in the batting order remains central to the team’s approach in the shortest format. In a post‑series conversation with the BCCI, Gambhir argued that traditional ideas about fixed batting positions have limited value in T20 cricket, where the primary focus must be on impact rather than accumulation.

“Look, that has been the ideology from day one when I took over as the head coach from Sri Lanka,” Gambhir said, reflecting on his tenure. “Till now, it hasn’t changed. I think batting orders are very overrated, except the openers. Obviously, the two openers are permanent, the rest I think everything shuffles because it’s not the amount of runs that matter in T20 cricket, it’s the impact that matters,” he continued.

Emphasis on impact over position

India have frequently shuffled batting roles under Gambhir, trying various combinations at No. 3 and No. 4 through the recently concluded series. While this approach drew questions about consistency and player rhythm, the head coach defended the strategy by underlining the difference between statistical output and situational influence.

“People sometimes miscalculate or do not differentiate between the batting order, the runs, and the impact. See, runs are different and impact is different. In T20 cricket, it’s all about the impact. It’s 120 balls. Every ball is an event. Every ball needs to have the maximum impact that we can have,” Gambhir said.

According to him, India’s approach requires batters to be ready to move across roles depending on the match situation, opposition matchups, and game state.

“That’s the reason from day one it has been a very fluid batting order, and that is how we want to play this game as well,” he said.

A forward-looking coaching mindset

Gambhir emphasized that this strategy is not merely tactical but philosophical, rooted in how modern T20 cricket continues to evolve. He noted that coaches must be equally adaptive to avoid falling behind.

“We don’t want to play a game thinking about averages, strike rates, and all that stuff. We’re thinking about how much impact a person can create in what situation. That is going to be very important for this T20 side because with time, T20 cricket will evolve, and if we as coaches don’t evolve, obviously, we will be behind the 8‑ball. We want to be ahead of T20 cricket, ahead of the times,” Gambhir said.

He further added, “I think, with time, T20 cricket will evolve. If we, as coaches, don’t evolve, we will be behind the eight ball. We want to be ahead of the times in T20I cricket. The young boys have adapted well to this idea. Hopefully, they continue adapting and evolving.”

All‑round strength offers greater balance

Gambhir credited India’s increasing tactical flexibility to the presence of multi‑dimensional cricketers, particularly spin-bowling all‑rounders who can influence the game in more than one discipline.

“How many teams have the luxury of having these kinds of spin all‑rounders? When we go overseas, sometimes we don’t get the luxury of seam-bowling all‑rounders. Imagine when touring sides come to India — we have got people like Axar and Washi, they can bat and bowl, they can get into a side purely as a batter as well. Imagine, it’s a great luxury to have. They are going to be very, very important come the World Cup. With the quality they have, they are going to flourish in all conditions,” he said.

Gambhir described Washington Sundar’s extended run as a long‑term developmental gain and pointed to Axar Patel’s ability to handle key situations with both bat and ball.

“That’s why involving Washi in the last seven or eight months has been a huge success for Indian cricket. Axar, batting at No. 5 in the Champions Trophy, has done exceptionally well. He bowls tough overs, bowls in the powerplay, bowls in the middle.”

Gambhir credited the team’s tactical depth to the emergence of reliable all-rounders, emphasising their dual-role flexibility as a crucial asset in modern white-ball cricket.

It’s always better to have more options. So many times in the past, we have worried about the sixth bowling option. We have now got seven or eight bowling options. For years and years, we have been talking about guys who can give a couple of overs, be it in a T20 or 50-over game. Now, we have guys who can give us overs and bat in the middle overs as well. It’s good to have those kinds of options and, more importantly, if these guys keep growing, Indian cricket will be in a very healthy space,” Gambhir said.

Looking ahead

India now turn toward back‑to‑back T20I assignments before the T20 World Cup begins early next year. With Gambhir continuing to back adaptable strategies, his impact‑driven model will remain central to selection, role definition, and tactical planning.

As the countdown to the World Cup begins, the coming months will test not just the squad’s skills, but its ability to internalize a philosophy that prizes flexibility over convention and impact over numbers.

,