Off-field controversy erupts over Pakistan’s Asia Cup kits
Just days before their high-stakes Asia Cup Super Four clash against India, the Pakistan cricket team is grappling with a new off-field controversy—this time over the quality of their kits. Former cricketer and coach Atiq-uz-Zaman has publicly criticised the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), alleging mismanagement and corruption in the procurement process.
He tweeted on X (formerly Twitter):
“Pakistan players sweating through low-quality kits while others wear proper dry-fits. This is what happens when tenders go to friends, not professionals. Corruption dripping more than the sweat.”
Pakistan players sweating through low-quality kits while others wear proper dry-fits. This is what happens when tenders go to friends, not professionals. Corruption dripping more than the sweat. #PAKvsUAE
— Atiq-uz-Zaman (@Atiq160Test) September 17, 2025
The comment has sparked widespread attention across cricketing circles and among fans, many of whom echoed similar observations. During Pakistan’s recent match against UAE, several players were seen visibly uncomfortable in sweat-drenched jerseys—an issue not noted with players from other teams. The controversy also coincides with the apparent absence of a kit sponsor listed on the PCB’s official website, despite the presence of other major commercial partners like Pepsi and TCL.
Atiq-uz-Zaman clarifies his remarks
Following the backlash and media attention his initial comments received, Atiq-uz-Zaman later clarified that his criticism was not directed at the PCB chairman personally, but at those overseeing kit procurement.
He tweeted on X (formerly Twitter):
“To be clear: my comments weren’t aimed at the Chairman. They were directed at those responsible for kit matters. The kit is part of performance too, and it should never be overlooked.”
To be clear: my comments weren’t aimed at the Chairman. They were directed at those responsible for kit matters. The kit is part of performance too, and it should never be overlooked.
— Atiq-uz-Zaman (@Atiq160Test) September 18, 2025
The clarification aimed to shift the focus from personalities to accountability within operational roles—especially in an area that can directly affect player comfort and on-field output.
