Mohammad Hafeez and Shahid Afridi have voiced strong criticisms against the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), highlighting concerns over political interference and the need for structural reforms within Pakistan cricket.
Hafeez Criticizes Political Influence in PCB
Responding to questions about political influence in cricketing decisions, Hafeez remarked, “The PCB chairman’s appointment is always based on political background… I don’t know about the rest,” indicating concerns over politicization in leadership roles within the board.
When asked about his absence from coaching or mentoring roles within the PCB, the former team director replied with a nod to political phrasing: “M minus one at the moment, and M loving it.”
Hafeez also praised young batters Abdullah Shafique and Saim Ayub, stating, “Abdullah Shafiq & Saim Ayub are future of Pakistan cricket. May they stay away from all distractions.”
Addressing Pakistan’s inconsistent form, he reaffirmed his support: “It hurts as a fan when Pakistan doesn’t do well, but I support them unconditionally and always want the team to succeed.”
Regarding Babar Azam and Mohammad Rizwan’s place in the squad, Hafeez defended their value: “Babar and Rizwan are quality players… They just need to upgrade their approach and skills to become more impactful. They have the talent to do that.”
In response to mockery of Rizwan’s English-speaking skills, Hafeez responded: “Sad to see people shaming a star for his language ability. Very sad.”
When asked what advice he would give to Babar Azam, Hafeez offered: “Keep learning.”
Afridi Calls for Structural Reforms and Criticizes PCB Appointments
Speaking to media in Gilgit, Afridi said, “If I had influence, I’d be the PCB chairman today. During our time, the national team had many match-winners — now, there aren’t as many.”
He emphasized the need for strong development at the grassroots level: “In Under-16, 17, and 19 teams, players need to be taught. We need capable people at the lower levels to train these players properly.”
Afridi also criticized the structure of domestic cricket and the political nature of PCB appointments: “If you hand over domestic cricket to a bureaucrat, no one will understand it,” he remarked. “Every PCB chairman comes in on political grounds. Changing faces won’t change the system.”
Addressing local talent, Afridi said, “If there’s talent in Gilgit-Baltistan, it won’t go to waste.” He added that if he were to join the PCB in any capacity, it would be for the sake of Pakistan: “I don’t want any contract or perks.”
Both Hafeez and Afridi’s remarks underscore a shared concern about the direction of Pakistan cricket, emphasizing the need for merit-based appointments and long-term planning to restore the team’s performance and reputation.
Name of Author: Cricexec Staff
