A fresh controversy has erupted between former Pakistan Test head coach Jason Gillespie and the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), with the former Australian fast bowler claiming he is still owed unpaid dues—an allegation the PCB firmly denies, citing a breach of contract.
Gillespie expresses disappointment over unpaid compensation
Gillespie, who was appointed as Pakistan’s red-ball head coach in April 2024 and departed later that year, publicly raised concerns about unpaid remuneration from his stint.
“Without going into the details, obviously still waiting on some remuneration from work that has been done. So just navigate through that in due course,” Gillespie said.
He added: “Admittedly, that has been a little bit disappointing but look, hopefully that can get sorted sooner rather than later.”
His remarks have once again spotlighted recurring issues around contractual clarity and financial governance within Pakistani cricket, particularly when it comes to foreign coaching appointments.
PCB issues formal denial, cites notice period violation
The PCB swiftly responded with an official press release, indirectly addressing Gillespie’s comments:
“The Pakistan Cricket Board refutes claims made by a former head coach on the non-payment of his dues. The former head coach abruptly left his position without giving a four month notice period, which was a clear breach of the contractual terms. The coaching contract explicitly mentioned a notice period applicable to both parties, and the coach was fully aware of it.”
Though Gillespie was not named directly, the statement was clearly aimed at the recent allegations. According to the board, Gillespie’s exit without serving the required notice voided certain financial entitlements under his contract.
Short-lived tenure ends in dispute
Gillespie’s time with Pakistan was part of a broader restructuring effort ahead of the World Test Championship cycle, but it ended abruptly with no official explanation at the time. The current compensation dispute only adds to the turbulence surrounding his tenure.
Legal clarity in question for PCB coaching deals
The incident raises broader concerns about the PCB’s contractual frameworks, particularly with foreign hires. Similar disputes have emerged in the past, with experts and former staff calling for greater transparency, legal clarity, and consistent enforcement of agreements.
Gillespie has not indicated any plans to escalate the issue legally, while the PCB appears firm in its stance. Whether the disagreement leads to a formal resolution or fades quietly remains to be seen.
What’s next?
With Pakistan cricket already under scrutiny for on-field and off-field challenges, this high-profile rift adds another layer to its growing list of administrative issues. If unresolved, the case may impact future willingness of international coaches to work with the PCB without stronger contractual safeguards.
Name of Author: Cricexec Staff
