Sunil Gavaskar has moved to firmly address criticism surrounding his recent remarks on Indian-owned franchises and his reported appearance on a Pakistan-linked show, pushing back against allegations of inconsistency in his stance.
The debate intensified after Gavaskar questioned Indian ownership indirectly benefiting Pakistani cricketers through overseas leagues, a position that triggered backlash given his own involvement in global cricket broadcasts and cross-border media appearances.
Gavaskar clarifies stance on commentary and financial involvement
Responding to the criticism in a conversation with Mumbai Mirror’s Amit Gupta, Gavaskar dismissed suggestions that his work in ICC and ACC events contradicts his position.
“Yes, I have been on commentary panels of ICC and ACC. The revenue went to all the participating countries from the ICC and ACC, but not from an Indian entity as far as I know. I don’t understand how you can say that I am a contributor since I am not making any payment to any commentator, Indian or any other nationality,” he stated.
He emphasised that his role does not involve directing funds, distancing himself from the financial implications critics have pointed to.
Strong position on Indian-owned franchises and Pakistan players
Gavaskar also reiterated his broader stance on Indian-linked entities engaging Pakistani cricketers in franchise leagues, maintaining that such arrangements raise concerns.
“I don’t know about other sports and what they are doing,” he said, before adding, “All I am praying for is that Indians stop paying Pakistanis. If you have noticed, the reverse has never happened for decades, if ever.”
He further clarified his limited visibility into global franchise ecosystems, noting, “I don’t follow the CPL, ILT20 or SA20, so I am not aware who is playing for whom.”
Despite that, he remained clear in his view, stating, “If there are Indian owners paying Pakistani players, then hopefully they will stop doing that.”
Dubai appearance addressed amid backlash
Another focal point of the criticism centred on Gavaskar’s reported participation in a show featuring former Pakistan cricketers during a major ICC event.
Addressing those claims, he said, “I did not ask for nor get paid for the show in Dubai.”
The clarification comes after scrutiny over his presence on a panel alongside former Pakistan players, which some viewed as inconsistent with his earlier comments.
Background: original remarks that triggered debate
The controversy stems from Gavaskar’s earlier position, where he linked Indian ownership structures to broader geopolitical implications.
Writing in his column for Mid-Day, he had argued, “Whether it is an Indian entity or an overseas subsidiary of the entity that is making the payment, if the owner is Indian, then he or she is contributing to the Indian casualties. It’s as simple as that.”
That statement, made in the context of franchise signings involving Pakistani players, reignited debate around the intersection of sport, ownership and national interest.
As discussions continue, Gavaskar’s latest remarks underline his attempt to separate personal professional roles from the financial and structural dynamics he has criticised, even as scrutiny around the issue persists.
